Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is better than HTC One ME, getting an 81.2 score against 73.5. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is just a little heavier than the HTC One ME, it's extremely thinner and also a lot newer. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One ME counts with just a bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density. LG V40 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V40 ThinQ takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality images and videos, a back facing camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.