Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blue and White |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is much better than HTC One ME's general score of 73.5. These phones work with Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some additional features. The LG V60 ThinQ body is much newer and a bit thinner than HTC One ME's, although it is also a lot heavier.
The HTC One ME has a better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of display and a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ takes much better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.