Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the HTC One ME's general score of 73.5. The LG Velvet construction is much newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than HTC One ME. HTC One ME counts with a brighter display than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher display density.
LG Velvet has a better processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. LG Velvet has a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture, a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG Velvet counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
The LG Velvet costs a little more than HTC One ME, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.