Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is much better than the HTC One ME's general score of 73.5. LG Wing is a noticeably newer device than the HTC One ME, but it's thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The LG Wing counts with a superior CPU than HTC One ME, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The HTC One ME has a more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
LG Wing counts with a superior memory for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing takes greater videos and photos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Wing also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The LG Wing features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One ME. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the HTC One ME, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.