Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is way better than HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. These phones use Android OS, but Motorola edge has newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some additional features. Motorola edge's construction is notably newer and just a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than the HTC One ME.
The HTC One ME counts with a much better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola edge features much more memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1,02 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola edge counts with a greater performance than HTC One ME, because it has more CPU cores and 3 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola edge takes way better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola edge features a very superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 58 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola edge is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.