Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the HTC One ME, having a 92.8 score against 73.5. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro construction is noticeably newer and thinner than HTC One ME's, although it is also somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a better performing processor than HTC One ME, because it has more CPU cores and 9 GB more RAM. HTC One ME has a better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a lot better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a way better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 58 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.