Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is better than the HTC One ME, having an 80.9 score against 73.5. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more recent 12 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing you some additional features. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is notably newer and thinner, but also way heavier than the HTC One ME.
The HTC One ME features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The HTC One ME has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better display pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a way bigger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The HTC One ME counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.