Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is slightly better than HTC One ME, with a 77.2 score against 73.5. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 has 13 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, giving you a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 40's design is incredibly newer and thinner than HTC One ME's, although it's just a bit heavier.
HTC One ME counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. HTC One ME counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser processing cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
The HTC One ME has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 2 TB. Motorola Edge 40 features a really longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 captures greater photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.