Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better than the HTC One ME, getting a general score of 77 against 73.5. Although Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit heavier than the HTC One ME, it's somewhat thinner and way newer. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a newer 13 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
The HTC One ME counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. HTC One ME features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a lot better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
HTC One ME has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 2 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 76 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.