Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is better than the HTC One ME's score of 73.5. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but a lot heavier than HTC One ME.
HTC One ME counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The HTC One ME counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 62 percent greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC One ME, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution back camera and a much larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.