Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is much better than HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit heavier than the HTC One ME, it's thinner and a lot newer.
HTC One ME features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB lesser RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit sharper display than HTC One ME, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.