Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than HTC One ME, but it's also somewhat heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, giving you a couple additional features.
HTC One ME counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC One ME features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less cores and less RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a really longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.