Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the HTC One ME's score of 73.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also notably heavier than the HTC One ME.
The HTC One ME has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a display that's very similar to the HTC One ME one, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor, a camera with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.