Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is slightly better than HTC One ME, with a overall score of 75.8 against 73.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. The Moto Z Force design is newer and thinner, but also just a little heavier than HTC One ME.
The Moto Z Force features a little faster processor than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The HTC One ME has a better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the HTC One ME also counts with a quite higher pixels count per inch in the screen.
Moto Z Force captures much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a back-facing camera with a higher 21 mega-pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto Z Force features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Force features superior battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
The Moto Z Force costs a little more than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.