Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is a bit better than HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Even though Motorola One Action is somewhat heavier than HTC One ME, it's just a bit thinner and also much newer. The Motorola One Action has a bit better CPU than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and more 2200 MHz CPU cores.
HTC One ME has a more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels density. Motorola One Action features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1,02 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Action counts with superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. The Motorola One Action has a better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
The Motorola One Action costs more than HTC One ME, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.