Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. Motorola One Hyper is a much newer and a bit thinner phone than the HTC One ME, although it's a lot heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has the newer 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
The HTC One ME has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen. The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores (although slower) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper features more storage to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1,02 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The Motorola One Hyper costs a lot more than the HTC One ME, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.