Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the HTC One ME, getting an 80 score against 73.5. The Motorola One Zoom body is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HTC One ME. HTC One ME features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better screen pixels density.
Motorola One Zoom features a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Motorola One Zoom features a greater camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
HTC One ME features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 2 TB. Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One ME. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get HTC One ME, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.