Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than the HTC One ME's general score of 73.5. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0. The Motorola razr (2020) is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC One ME, but it is somewhat heavier.
The HTC One ME has a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) features a more powerful CPU than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores. Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the battery performance in HTC One ME, although the Motorola razr (2020) has just 2800mAh of battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One ME. If you want to save some money, you can get the HTC One ME, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.