Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Meteor grey |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a little bit better than the HTC One ME, with an 80.3 score against 73.5. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but heavier than the HTC One ME. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a little bit better performance than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more CPU cores and more RAM. HTC One ME features an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1,02 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One ME. If you want to save some money, you can buy the HTC One ME, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.