Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blue |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a general score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. Although the Nokia 9 PureView is just a bit heavier than the HTC One ME, it's somewhat thinner and newer. HTC One ME counts with a little sharper display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a more powerful processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. HTC One ME features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 2 TB.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a superior camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The Nokia 9 PureView has greater battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One ME. If you want to save some money, you can buy the HTC One ME, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.