Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cyber shade |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is a little bit better than the HTC One ME, getting a general score of 75.8 against 73.5. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a newer 9.0 Pie version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0. Nubia Red Magic 3S's design has the same thickness than HTC One ME, but it is much heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. HTC One ME features a better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a much higher video resolution, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 76% greater battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One ME. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One ME, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.