Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Sonic silver |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a general score of 76.2, which is a bit better than the HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, offering lots of additional features. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a extremely heavier phone than the HTC One ME, but they are 0.38inches thick.
The HTC One ME has a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The HTC One ME has a much better storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 2 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a quite superior performance than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than HTC One ME, because it has a camera with way more mega pixels, a lot higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One ME, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.