Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is a little bit better than HTC One ME, with a general score of 77 against 73.5. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's construction is incredibly thinner but heavier than the HTC One ME. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a greater performance than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. HTC One ME features a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a very superior camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much larger aperture for better low light images and video and a lot better resolution back facing camera. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The HTC One ME counts with a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.