Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a general score of 76.1, which is slightly better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has a newer 12 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it provides lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy A22's design is newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it is somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with just a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores (but slower). The HTC One ME has a much sharper display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy A22 takes a little bit better videos and photos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a back camera with way more MP. Galaxy A22 features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage.
HTC One ME counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.