Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is better than HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but way heavier than HTC One ME. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a more recent 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, counting with some extra features and improved performance.
The HTC One ME features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher display density. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more 2200 MHz cpu cores.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.