Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is a bit better than HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is incredibly heavier than the HTC One ME, it's thinner and incredibly newer. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it offers some additional features.
The HTC One ME has a better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. HTC One ME features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 2 TB.
HTC One ME counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 7 less cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory. Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.