Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. The Galaxy A50 is a way newer and way thinner phone than the HTC One ME, although it is a little heavier. The HTC One ME counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1,5 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy A50 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.