Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the HTC One ME, getting a general score of 86.6 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is much newer and noticeably thinner, but just a bit heavier than HTC One ME. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple additional features and increased performance.
The HTC One ME counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher count of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a quite better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A50s features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1,5 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A50s features a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
Galaxy A50s shoots way better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50s also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.