Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the HTC One ME, with a global score of 85.5 against 73.5. The Galaxy A51 is a extremely newer and thinner phone than HTC One ME, although it is a little heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more cores. HTC One ME features a sharper screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Galaxy A51 shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a bit more money than the HTC One ME, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.