Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism cube black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the HTC One ME, having a 90.8 score against 73.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is a lot newer and thinner than the HTC One ME's, but it's also somewhat heavier.
The HTC One ME has a brighter screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more 2.2 gigahertz cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs more than HTC One ME, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.