Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than HTC One ME, having a 90.7 score against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A52 is somewhat heavier than HTC One ME, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. HTC One ME has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger camera aperture, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.