Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than HTC One ME, having a score of 91.3 against 73.5. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is way newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One ME's, although it is heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some additional features.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and more processing cores. HTC One ME has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 58 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.