Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic; metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a bit better than the HTC One ME, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 73.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy A6 is a little heavier than HTC One ME, it's notably thinner and incredibly newer. The Samsung Galaxy A6 has a bit better processing power than HTC One ME, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has more CPU cores.
HTC One ME counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution. HTC One ME has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the HTC One ME also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 has a little longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A6 captures much better videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, a lot lower (Full HD) video definition and a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A6 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.