Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than HTC One ME, getting a 76.9 score against 73.5. Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is somewhat heavier than HTC One ME, it's thinner and way newer. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the newer 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
HTC One ME has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better CPU than HTC One ME, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy A70 counts with a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. HTC One ME shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the HTC One ME also counts with a bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 58 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A70 is more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.