Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than HTC One ME, with a 92.9 score against 73.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is heavier than HTC One ME, it's somewhat thinner and also much newer. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, giving you some extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a faster processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The HTC One ME counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than HTC One ME, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.