Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic; metal | Metal |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is a bit better than HTC One ME, getting a general score of 77.7 against 73.5. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C7 has 8.0 Oreo version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a couple additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy C7 is just a bit heavier than HTC One ME, it's way thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (although slower). HTC One ME has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
HTC One ME counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The Galaxy C7 features greater battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Galaxy C7 takes just a bit better videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot lower 1920x1080 video quality and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.