Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, offering some extra features. Galaxy F62's construction is a lot newer and a little thinner, but notably heavier than the HTC One ME.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit superior processor than HTC One ME, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. HTC One ME features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy F62 counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F62 captures much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 146 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.