Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is much better than the HTC One ME, with a general score of 82.4 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy M30 is a way newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than HTC One ME, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (although slower). HTC One ME has a lot better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher display pixels density.
The Galaxy M30 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a way smaller sensor taking much lower quality pictures and videos, a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels and a much lower video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a really longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.