Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than HTC One ME, getting an 87.7 score against 73.5. The Galaxy M51 body is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it's also much heavier. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Galaxy M51 has a more recent 10 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One ME features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy M51 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of 2200 MHz cores. Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 146 percent greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photos and videos and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.