Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the HTC One ME, having a 90.8 score against 73.5. Galaxy Note 20's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than HTC One ME. The HTC One ME counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
HTC One ME features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 captures way better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs, a much better video definition and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC One ME, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.