Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than HTC One ME, having a 98.9 score against 73.5. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than HTC One ME.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite superior performance than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more processing cores and more RAM. HTC One ME counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a much better video resolution, a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more storage to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 58% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than HTC One ME, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.