Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than HTC One ME, getting an 81.2 score against 73.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is older and just a little bit heavier than HTC One ME, it's design is still somewhat thinner. These phones include the same Android 5.0 operating system. HTC One ME has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The HTC One ME has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit faster processing unit than HTC One ME, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also has an extra graphics co-processor and more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, although it has a lot tinier sensor which provides a lot worse photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size aperture. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more money than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.