Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the HTC One ME, getting an 80.4 score against 73.5. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner device than the HTC One ME, although it's just a little heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little faster processor than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
HTC One ME counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the HTC One ME also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition takes much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture.
HTC One ME counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One ME. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the HTC One ME, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.