Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a lot better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a little bit heavier than HTC One ME, it's thinner and also extremely newer. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
HTC One ME has a brighter screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher screen density. Galaxy Note10 has just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note10 features greater battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note10 features a much better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One ME. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the HTC One ME, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.