Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than HTC One ME's score of 73.5. Even though Galaxy Note7 is a little bit heavier than HTC One ME, it's thinner and newer. The HTC One ME has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the HTC One ME also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch of screen.
The HTC One ME counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 2 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little bit better performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a superior camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, a way less mega-pixels back camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.