Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-09-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is much better than HTC One ME, having a global score of 83 against 73.5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, offering a lot of extra features. The Galaxy Note8 construction is notably newer and thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it's incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy Note8 has a more powerful CPU than HTC One ME, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. HTC One ME has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a worse (4K) video definition and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
The HTC One ME has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 2 TB. The Galaxy Note8 counts with better battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note8 is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.