Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is notably newer and just a little thinner, but also notably heavier than HTC One ME.
The HTC One ME counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a faster CPU than HTC One ME, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 76% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a lot better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than HTC One ME, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.