Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than HTC One ME, with a 95.4 score against 73.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is much newer and a little thinner than HTC One ME's, but it's a lot heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a quite superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than HTC One ME, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a way bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
HTC One ME counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much longer battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One ME. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the HTC One ME, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.