Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the HTC One ME, getting a 90.7 score against 73.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than HTC One ME. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit better screen than HTC One ME, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a really larger display. HTC One ME has a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit more memory for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 76 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than HTC One ME, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.