Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's construction is newer than the HTC One ME's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. HTC One ME counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the HTC One ME also counts with a little larger screen.
HTC One ME has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC One ME also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 2 TB. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little better performance than HTC One ME, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a much better battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 41 percent more battery size. The Galaxy S7 Active shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.